Jim Simons and the Riemann Hypothesis — the benchmark for AI math claims

There was a famous interview with Jim Simons, who's the famous mathematician behind Chern Simons theory, but I think everyone else knows him as the creator of the hedge fund, Renaissance Technologies, that has the Medallion Fund, which mysteriously just prints money. I think their worst year ever was 20%. That was their worst year in the past, like 30 years. Usually they do like 40%, 70%. He was worth $30 billion when he died. And he was asked in this interview, if you could trade your wealth for solving the Riemann hypothesis, would you do it? And you could see him just perk up and he was like, Oh, that's, that's a good question. And then he like sort of stares off into the distance and starts like fantasizing about solving the Riemann hypothesis. And then he later on, he like goes back to the scripted. Oh, you know, my life has been great. You can't choose how your life ends up, you know, no regrets, hashtag, no regrets, but you could behind it all, you could tell it was a yes. This is a man who was, who was like, I could have done that. Would have done that. That would have, that would have been sick. So given the aura around the Riemann hypothesis, it has become the gold standard around which AI's mathematical capability is judged. And we see this actually in our own comments section. Okay. Whenever we talk about like AI doing math and doing crazy things, like when we covered the Jacobian conjecture not too long ago, a lot of people in the comments are just like, well,…